Market selection
The shortlist is only as good as its disagreements
A prioritization model that produces unanimous agreement usually encoded the answer someone already wanted. Useful models make the trade-offs visible enough to argue about.
Insights
Short, practical observations from running international expansion work. Longer analysis pieces are published as engagements conclude.
Market selection
A prioritization model that produces unanimous agreement usually encoded the answer someone already wanted. Useful models make the trade-offs visible enough to argue about.
Entry models
Choosing a distributor or channel partner because direct build feels expensive tends to produce weak terms. Choosing it because coverage economics demand it produces strong ones.
Localization
Buyers notice pricing form, contract structure, proof type, and response expectations long before they notice language quality.
Launch
Teams that refuse to define gates rarely launch earlier. They launch on the same date with more unresolved issues and less visibility into them.
Governance
Post-launch drift is almost never a strategy failure. It is the absence of a standing review where variance against plan has to be explained.
Scaling
If it is not, the first expansion produced outcomes but no reusable operating knowledge. That is worth fixing before committing to a third.
More depth
Market-specific briefings and methodology documents are provided during assessment rather than published broadly, because they are only useful against a specific category and offer.
Start with a structured assessment of where you should expand next, or speak directly with an expansion strategist about the market you have already chosen.